tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-507407926422813558.post37627850689964175..comments2019-08-27T14:41:19.687+05:30Comments on Mediahyderabad: Ringside view of the Front PageSatyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07772741681124387820noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-507407926422813558.post-27555888613384961632006-12-29T13:50:00.000+05:302006-12-29T13:50:00.000+05:30Hold on, we still have one age before you say buy ...Hold on, we still have one age before you say buy to 2006.<br /><br />The Dec 18., 2006 Issue of India Today International has the following title on its cover: India 30 years ahead.<br />Please read that.<br />A few interesting headlines are:<br />Saty, You said about Chandigarh, and I quote about it!]:<br />Q. Which State will be the most prosporous?<br />A. It will be Chandigarh, followed by Delhi. (p. 29)<br />This article is written by bibek debroy-- a leading economist. The first para, probably deals with the issue you are dealing, break up of the existing state and its need / results. I quote:<br />"The question presupposes that states will continue in their present geographical form and will not be broken up. UP, Rajasthan, Maharashtra, AP and WB are too large to be governed efficiently."<br /><br />here is the link to the online version (bookmark this to read the headlines, for free): www.indiatoday.com/itoday/index.html<br /><br />A web link to the current issue, cited above: www.indiatoday.com/itoday/20061218/index.shtml<br />Let me know if you don't find this magazine.Hyderabadizhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16875146798558787183noreply@blogger.com